Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
When a lender provides financing to a commercial borrower, it typically requires the borrower to grant a security interest in some or all of the borrower's assets. Among many other types of assets or collateral, a borrower may be required to grant a security interest in stock or membership interests owned by the borrower, including stock or membership interests in the borrower's subsidiaries or affiliates.
Of course, simply obtaining a security interest provides only marginal protection relative to parties other than the borrower ' including, for example, competing secured creditors or trustees in bankruptcy. See, e.g., UCC ' 9-322 (priority rules governing competing security interests in collateral); and 11 U.S.C. ' 546 (bankruptcy trustee possesses rights and powers of certain lien creditors). Thus, in addition to merely obtaining a security interest, a lender must take all necessary steps under the Uniform Commercial Code (“UCC” (the UCC has been adopted in all 50 states with some ' usually, but not always, minor ' variations)) or other applicable law to perfect that interest.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
A federal district court in Miami, FL, has ruled that former National Basketball Association star Shaquille O'Neal will have to face a lawsuit over his promotion of unregistered securities in the form of cryptocurrency tokens and that he was a "seller" of these unregistered securities.
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?