Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Artist Merchandise-Approval Form Doesn't Shield Live Nation From Liability for Willful Infringement of Photographer's Works
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit decided in part that a jury could reasonably find Live Nation willfully infringed on a photographer's copyrights when using his photos on Run-DMC merchandise. Friedman v. Live Nation Merchandise Inc., 14-55302. Glen Friedman sued in the Central District of California over use of photos he took of the iconic rap group in the 1980s that Live Nation included in a 2008 calendar and on several t-shirt designs. Live Nation did stipulate it had infringed, but the district court granted summary judgment to the merchandiser as to whether the infringement was willful, which could have increased infringement damages. Live Nation's artist merchandise contracts give artists such as Run-DMC approval rights over design and distribution of merchandise. However, reversing the summary judgment ruling on willfulness, the Ninth Circuit noted that a Live Nation employee claimed in a declaration “only that as an industry practice 'it is generally the responsibility of the music artists' personal managers to uncover the relevant facts and ascertain the scope of the music artists' rights.' Given an approval process that never explicitly asks about copyrights at all, a jury could reasonably conclude that Live Nation's reliance on [Run-DMC] who were the subjects of the photographs at issue to clear photographic rights, rather than on the photographers who took them ' based only on a purported industry practice never reflected in any document ' amounted to recklessness or willful disregard, and thus willfulness.”
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
As consumers continue to shift purchasing and consumption habits in the aftermath of the pandemic, manufacturers are increasingly reliant on third-party logistics and warehousing to ensure their products timely reach the market.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.