Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
At a recent CIO panel, an audience member asked the three of us on stage: “What do you see as your number one priority in the coming 12 months?” It was my turn to go first, and I responded “cybersecurity” without hesitation. The panelist that followed said that cybersecurity was a priority, but that it is a subset of risk management, which is much more comprehensive and includes as a subset cyber threats and cyber risk management. This was not the first time I have heard the chief information pro and/or technologist in a large company make that point, and I have to respectfully disagree.
While some time-tested risk management concepts and strategies may be exactly the right approach for dealing with cyber risk, relegating it to a subset of anything speaks to a lack of understanding of the problem and will ultimately increase risk significantly. The rapid pace of increasing complexity and the increasingly crippling impacts of cyber-specific threats demand a different degree of prioritization, resources and tireless attention than any other type of risk corporations face today. In the same way that technology will change the way we do business more in the next five years than any other catalyst, cyber risks will challenge our ability to operate more than any other threat.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.
A defendant in a patent infringement suit may, during discovery and prior to a <i>Markman</i> hearing, compel the plaintiff to produce claim charts, claim constructions, and element-by-element infringement analyses.