Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Bit Parts

By Stan Soocher
November 01, 2016

The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York refused to grant sanctions against litigation counsel for a record production company and its owner that filed suit over an alleged improper use in the VH-1 series Love & Hip-Hop: New York of music by one of the plaintiffs' artist. Scrilla Hill Entertainment v. Dupree, 16-CV-490. Scrilla Hill filed suit claiming that the VH-1/Viacom program improperly aired music written by Scrilla Hill artist Young B. But, according to the court, the defendants later learned that an assertion by Scrilla Hill case counsel Israel Adam Burns that his clients were the owners of the rights to a Young B “Chicken Noodle Soup” music video, which appeared without sound in Love & Hip-Hop, “was false.” (In an interesting footnote, Southern District Judge Jesse M. Furman noted: “Burns represents (albeit improperly, in his unsworn memorandum of law) that he had claimed his clients owned the rights to the 'Chicken Noodle Soup' music video by relying in part on a 2006 royalty statement and invoice that showed UMG [the actual copyright owner of the music video] had paid Scrilla Hill artist royalties. [TV show producer and co-defendant] Eastern's only response is that the significance of the royalty statement is 'unclear.'”) Burns did file a voluntary dismissal notice, but the defendants decided to move for attorney fees sanctions against him on the ground that the plaintiffs' copyright infringement claim was frivolous. Burns responded by sending an insulting email to defense counsel. District Judge Furman determined that “the Court is reluctantly compelled to deny Defendants' application for attorney's fees. Judge Furman noted in part: “[S]ignificantly, Burns was put on notice that the claim was meritless only after Plaintiffs had filed the First Amended Complaint and, thereafter, Plaintiffs made no more filings other than the notice of voluntary dismissal.” The district judge continued: “And while Burns's dealings with opposing counsel outside the courtroom may have fallen particularly short of professional standards, awarding attorneys' fees requires more than that. It requires clear bad faith, which generally means persistent misconduct that rises above mere incompetence or petulance or even an unfortunate mix of the two. As a result, sanctions are not warranted based on Burns' present failings, however unfortunate they may be.”

*****
Stan Soocher
is Editor-in-Chief of Entertainment Law & Finance and a tenured Associate Professor of Music & Entertainment Studies at the University of Colorado's Denver Campus. He is the author of Baby You're a Rich Man: Suing the Beatles for Fun & Profit (ForeEdge/University Press of New England) (http://amzn.to/1EWt79L). For more, visit www.stansoocher.com.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

The Bankruptcy Hotline Image

Recent cases of importance to your practice.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.

How AI Has Affected PR Image

When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.