Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Editor's Note: Last month, the authors began a discussion of the legal consequences of the release of the so-called “Panama Papers,” a trove of more than 11.5 million documents a whistleblower gave to a reporter at the German newspaper Süddeutsche Zeitung (SZ) in Spring 2016. The documents detail how certain wealthy people — including foreign government leaders — hid assets in offsore entities created by Panamanian law firm Mossack Fonesca for clients allegedly seeking to avoid taxation in their home countries. Since the release of the Panama Papers, several consequences have ensued, including, as discussed last month, 1) the public disgrace and resignation of foreign public officials and 2) the commencement of tax avoidance investigations. Additionally, the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York has opened an investigation into the finances of the reported 240 U.S. citizens identified in some way with the firm and its scheme. The subject of this inquiry has not been fully disclosed, but it may be that tax avoidance is just one of the subjects the government is interested in investigating. The authors conclude their analysis of the fallout accompanying the release of the Panama Papers herein.
Stage 3: Fallout: SEC Investigation
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.