Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
<i>He, Cuevas,</i> and the Law of Remittitur in New Jersey
It is well accepted and recognized by New Jersey's courts that compensatory damages should encompass no more than the amount that will make a plaintiff whole, which is the actual loss. Fair compensatory damages should neither reward a plaintiff nor punish a defendant, but should be commensurate with a plaintiff's loss. Caldwell v. Hayes, 136 N.J. 422, 433 (1994). Despite the established purpose of a compensatory damage award, there are occasions when a verdict is so excessive it could only have been arrived at in an effort to punish, rather than to compensate. In those instances of a “runaway” jury award, there are two generally recognized forms of relief available to address the excessive verdict: a new trial as to damages only, or remittitur.
Remittitur is designed to bring excessive damages awarded by a jury to the level the court knows is within the limits of a proper verdict, thereby avoiding the necessity of a new trial. Fertile v. St. Michael's Medical Center, 169 N.J. 481, 491 (2001). A trial court is permitted to order a remittitur when it determines that a jury's award is disproportionate to the injuries and the award rises to the level of shocking the court's conscience. Hinojo v. New Jersey Manufacturers Insurance Co., 353 N.J. Super. 261, 277 (App. Div. 2002). A jury's verdict may be reduced when the trial court determines that the verdict is “wide of the mark.” Johnson v. Scaccetti, 192 N.J. 256, 281 (2007). “The goal is not for the judge to substitute his or her judgment for that of the jury, but to correct the jury's clear error or mistake.” Baxter v. Fairmont Food Company, 74 N.J. 588, 597 (1977). Moreover, a jury's damages verdict is not sacrosanct and can be reduced when affirming the award would arise to a miscarriage of justice. Id.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
How AI Has Affected PR
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.