Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Before the advent of social media, the most feared type of surveillance was the video tape. Defense lawyers and insurance companies routinely spent tens of thousands of dollars in the hopes of landing a 30-second video showing the plaintiff engaged in an activity that he could not possibly do if he was as badly injured as he claimed. Stories are legend in which the injured plaintiff was videotaped changing a tire, running, skiing, walking with ease up and down stairs or shoveling snow. While each of these activities had the potential to severely damage the plaintiff's claims, it was a given that the videotaped footage would depict the plaintiff outside of his home. Indeed, it was “off limits” for the videographer to surreptitiously tape inside the plaintiff's home. But with the advent of social media, the boundary of the front door is a thing of the past. Now, with little more than the click of a mouse, insurance companies and defense attorneys have a window “inside the home” and into the life of the plaintiff unlike anything seen before. What was once “off limits” is now readily available and created by the most unlikely of partners: the plaintiff, his friends and family.
Platforms such as Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, Twitter, or YouTube may contain photographs, videos, or statements posted by your client or others that have the potential to harm their case. Whether it is a photograph from a trip or simply the daily minutiae of life, social media postings can be a wealth of information for your adversary. Trial attorneys and litigants must fully appreciate the potential impact of social media on a case. Postings of comments or photographs become part of the permanent record on the Internet. There is no such thing as deleting a post or erasing the past. Because of the potentially adverse consequences, trial lawyers are now duty bound to run a thorough social media search of their clients, adversaries, and witnesses in every case. To the extent an attorney fails to conduct such a search, not only will she be at a severe disadvantage in the case but her competence as a trial lawyer can be called into question.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
A trend analysis of the benefits and challenges of bringing back administrative, word processing and billing services to law offices.
Summary Judgment Denied Defendant in Declaratory Action by Producer of To Kill a Mockingbird Broadway Play Seeking Amateur Theatrical Rights
“Baseball arbitration” refers to the process used in Major League Baseball in which if an eligible player's representative and the club ownership cannot reach a compensation agreement through negotiation, each party enters a final submission and during a formal hearing each side — player and management — presents its case and then the designated panel of arbitrators chooses one of the salary bids with no other result being allowed. This method has become increasingly popular even beyond the sport of baseball.
Executives have access to some of the company's most sensitive information, and they're increasingly being targeted by hackers looking to steal company secrets or to perpetrate cybercrimes.