Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Chapter 9 of the Bankruptcy Code is a ghost, of sorts. Everyone knows about it and it's existed for a long time, but there isn't much substantive law there. Any bankruptcy practitioner, upon first contact with a municipal bankruptcy case, may be shocked by the lack of substantive law to be found in Chapter 9. The dearth of detail has long caused bankruptcy lawyers and courts to turn to the far more substantive provisions of Chapter 11 for practical guidance. Even more interesting, and many times frustrating, is that the interests of constituents who are not recognized to have any legal standing will nonetheless have important, and sometimes dramatic, influence over the direction of a municipal case.
Under other chapters of the Bankruptcy Code, the constituents can predictably be corralled and branded: debtor, secured creditors, unsecured creditors, equity security holders, perhaps a trustee and, of course, the Office of the United States Trustee. In a Chapter 9 case, this defined universe of identifiable interests is expanded to include the more amorphous opinions and positions of the public, the media and politicians of various shapes and sizes. Such opinions and positions are often at odds with the legal dictates of the Bankruptcy Code, but recent experience acts as a reminder that such constituents must be “classified” and “treated” during the course of a Chapter 9 case just as if they were creditors holding claims.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.