Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Mash-Up of Dr. Seuss/Star Trek Components Is a Fair Use
The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California decided that the book Oh, the Places You'll Boldly Go!, which mashes up components from the Dr. Seuss book Oh, the Places You'll Go with components from Star Trek adventures, was a copyright fair use. Dr. Seuss Enterprises L.P. v. ComicMix LLC, 16cv2779. District Judge Janis L. Sammartino reached her decision on a motion to dismiss. On the purpose and character of use, the defendants had claimed their work was a parody. District Judge Sammartino disagreed by finding, “Boldly merely uses Go!'s illustration style and story format as a means of conveying particular adventures and tropes from the Star Trek canon.” But the district judge went on to find that “although Boldly fails to qualify as a parody it is no doubt transformative. In particular, it combines into a completely unique work the two disparate worlds of Dr. Seuss and Star Trek.” On amount and substantiality of use, Judge Sammartino observed: “[T]here is no dispute that Boldly copies many aspects of Go!'s and other Dr. Seuss illustrations. However, Boldly does not copy them in their entirety; each is infused with new meaning and additional illustrations that reframe the Seuss images from a unique Star Trek viewpoint. Nor does Boldly copy more than is necessary to accomplish its transformative purpose.” Acknowledging the popularity of mash-ups as an art form (while noting not all mash-ups will be fair uses), the district court emphasized: “[I]f fair use was not viable in a case such as this, an entire body of highly creative work would be effectively foreclosed.” Finally, on Dr. Seuss Enterprises's Lanham Act trademark violation claim over title and typeface, the court found none because the defendant's uses of those were artistically relevant to Boldly.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.