Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Mash-Up of Dr. Seuss/Star Trek Components Is a Fair Use
The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California decided that the book Oh, the Places You'll Boldly Go!, which mashes up components from the Dr. Seuss book Oh, the Places You'll Go with components from Star Trek adventures, was a copyright fair use. Dr. Seuss Enterprises L.P. v. ComicMix LLC, 16cv2779. District Judge Janis L. Sammartino reached her decision on a motion to dismiss. On the purpose and character of use, the defendants had claimed their work was a parody. District Judge Sammartino disagreed by finding, “Boldly merely uses Go!'s illustration style and story format as a means of conveying particular adventures and tropes from the Star Trek canon.” But the district judge went on to find that “although Boldly fails to qualify as a parody it is no doubt transformative. In particular, it combines into a completely unique work the two disparate worlds of Dr. Seuss and Star Trek.” On amount and substantiality of use, Judge Sammartino observed: “[T]here is no dispute that Boldly copies many aspects of Go!'s and other Dr. Seuss illustrations. However, Boldly does not copy them in their entirety; each is infused with new meaning and additional illustrations that reframe the Seuss images from a unique Star Trek viewpoint. Nor does Boldly copy more than is necessary to accomplish its transformative purpose.” Acknowledging the popularity of mash-ups as an art form (while noting not all mash-ups will be fair uses), the district court emphasized: “[I]f fair use was not viable in a case such as this, an entire body of highly creative work would be effectively foreclosed.” Finally, on Dr. Seuss Enterprises's Lanham Act trademark violation claim over title and typeface, the court found none because the defendant's uses of those were artistically relevant to Boldly.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.