Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The Growing Risk of Providing Oral Summaries
In December 2017, a Magistrate Judge of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida held that an “oral download” of outside counsel's interview notes to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) resulted in a limited waiver of protection under the attorney work-product doctrine over the underlying interview notes and memoranda. Order on Defendants' Motion to Compel Production from Non-Party Law Firm, SEC v. Herrera, et al., No. 17- 20301 (S.D. Fl. Dec. 5, 2017). The decision is a significant one, and underscores one of the core challenges facing companies seeking to cooperate with the government during the course of its investigations — namely, the delicate balance between seeking to maximize its potential to receive cooperation credit while avoiding an actual waiver of attorney-client or work-product privileges.
In light of the government's profound emphasis on cooperation — and, as a corollary, a company's overwhelming incentive to take a posture of full cooperation — a balance is becoming even more difficult to strike. In response, companies and their outside counsel often relyupon oral summaries in order to disclose factual information to the investigating agency. Given that Herrera now stands for the proposition that such acts may amount to waiver, the decision may serve to reshape the manner in which companies disclose certain findings of its internal interviews.
The Herrera Decision
In 2012, a company retained an outside law firm (the Firm) to provide legal advice concerning alleged accounting errors in its South American subsidiary (the Subsidiary). The Firm commenced an internal investigation and, at its close, informed the SEC of the investigation, upon which the SEC determined to open its own investigation. During the course of the SEC's investigation, the Firm met with SEC staff and provided oral briefings of 12 witness interviews.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why So Many Great Lawyers Stink at Business Development and What Law Firms Are Doing About It
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
A Lawyer's System for Active Reading
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
Protecting Innovation in the Cyber World from Patent Trolls
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.