Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

The Seizure of Attorney-Client Communications: Fighting Back

By Ronald H. Levine

DOJ Guidelines and Regulations

See, e.g., Klitzman, Klitzman & Gallagher v. Krut
  1. They are limited to searches of an attorney's “premises” — a law firm's or in-house attorney's office and files — and arguably it does not apply to searches of other offices or other computers at a business in which legal materials may be located; and
  2. They are limited to searches regarding “subject attorneys,” defined as an attorney who is either:
    1. a “suspect, subject or target”;
    2. related by blood or marriage to a suspect; or
    3. believed to be in possession of contraband or the fruits or instrumentalities of a crime. U.S.A.M. at §9-13.420. Search warrants for premises of subject attorneys must be approved by the U.S. Attorney after consultation with the Department of Justice. Search warrants regarding attorneys who are not “subject attorneys” but rather “disinterested third parties” require approval by a Deputy Assistant Attorney General. See, 28 C.F.R. §59.4(b)(2) (cited in U.S.A.M. at §§9-19.220-221).
See, e.g
  1. Whether the advance notice provided by a subpoena would likely result in the destruction, alteration, concealment or transfer of the materials sought because the suspect has direct control over, or indirect access to, the materials sought (via friendship with, loyalty to, or sympathy for, the possessor of the materials); and
  2. Whether the immediate seizure of the materials is necessary to prevent injury to persons or property or to preserve their evidentiary value and/or to prevent delay in obtaining the materials, which delay would significantly jeopardize an ongoing investigation or prosecution.
Id See, e.g., Carpenter v. Comm'r., IRS
  1. Review of either all seized materials, or of just those materials thought arguably to be privileged, by a judicial officer or special master;
  2. The provision of a copy of seized materials to the defense attorney; and
  3. Defense attorney input to the court regarding disputes over the seizure of privileged documents.

Pushing Back

A person aggrieved by an unlawful search and seizure of property or by the deprivation of property may move for the property's return …. The court must receive evidence on any factual issue necessary to decide the motion. If it grants the motion, the court must return the property to the movant, but may impose reasonable conditions to protect access to the property and its use in later proceedings.

lawfully See See, e.g., In re Grand Jury Subpoenas in camera In re Fattah United States v. Singleton Id Gmach Shefa Chaim v. United States
  1. Whether the government displayed a callous disregard for the rights of the movant;
  2. Whether the movant has an individual interest in and need for the property he wants returned;
  3. Whether the movant would be irreparably injured by denying return of the property; and
  4. Whether the movant has an adequate remedy at law for the redress of his grievance.
United States v. Singleton accord Klitzman, Klitzman & Gallagher v. Krut aff'd in camera See, e.g., United States v. Jimenez in camera United States v. Sperow

Conclusion

specifically ***** Ronald H. Levine [email protected]

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

Judge Rules Shaquille O'Neal Will Face Securities Lawsuit for Promotion, Sale of NFTs Image

A federal district court in Miami, FL, has ruled that former National Basketball Association star Shaquille O'Neal will have to face a lawsuit over his promotion of unregistered securities in the form of cryptocurrency tokens and that he was a "seller" of these unregistered securities.

Why So Many Great Lawyers Stink at Business Development and What Law Firms Are Doing About It Image

Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?

Blockchain Domains: New Developments for Brand Owners Image

Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.

Coverage Issues Stemming from Dry Cleaner Contamination Suits Image

In recent years, there has been a growing number of dry cleaners claiming to be "organic," "green," or "eco-friendly." While that may be true with respect to some, many dry cleaners continue to use a cleaning method involving the use of a solvent called perchloroethylene, commonly known as perc. And, there seems to be an increasing number of lawsuits stemming from environmental problems associated with historic dry cleaning operations utilizing this chemical.