Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

The Bankruptcy StrategistFeaturesBankruptcyLitigation

Acquisition of Claims for Plan Control

By Jeff J. Friedman
September 01, 2018

The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently provided additional guidance to creditors seeking to block confirmation of a plan by acquiring claims against the debtor. In Pacific Western Bank, et al. v. Fagerdala USA-Lompoc, Inc. (In re Fagerdala USA-Lompoc, Inc.), 891 F.3d 848 (9th Cir. 2018), the court held that a bankruptcy court may not designate claims under section 1126(e) of the Bankruptcy Code for bad faith simply because a creditor offers to purchase only a subset of available claims to block confirmation of a plan or because blocking confirmation will adversely impact the remaining creditors.

Relying heavily and expanding on the court's twenty-year old decision in Figter Ltd. v. Teachers Ins. & Annuity Ass'n of Am. (In re Figter, Ltd.), 118 F.3d 635 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 996 (1997), the court held that “[a]t a minimum, there must be evidence that a creditor is seeking 'to secure some untoward advantage over other creditors for some ulterior motive.'” 891 F.3d at 854, citing Figter, 118 F.3d at 639.

The Case

In Fagerdala, Pacific Western Bank, which held the senior secured claim against the debtor through its wholly owned subsidiary Coastline RE Holdings Corp. (Pacific Western), had its votes designated in respect of unsecured claims it acquired to block confirmation of the debtor's plan. The court held that “the bankruptcy court erred when it refused to analyze whether Pacific Western acted under an 'ulterior motive', beyond its 'mere enlightened self interest' in protecting its secured claim.” 891 F.3d at 852.

This premium content is locked for The Bankruptcy Strategist subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

Compliance Officers: Recent Regulatory Guidance and Enforcement Actions and Mitigating the Risk of Personal Liability Image

This article explores legal developments over the past year that may impact compliance officer personal liability.