Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Acquisition of Claims for Plan Control

By Jeff J. Friedman

The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently provided additional guidance to creditors seeking to block confirmation of a plan by acquiring claims against the debtor. In Pacific Western Bank, et al. v. Fagerdala USA-Lompoc, Inc. (In re Fagerdala USA-Lompoc, Inc.), 891 F.3d 848 (9th Cir. 2018), the court held that a bankruptcy court may not designate claims under section 1126(e) of the Bankruptcy Code for bad faith simply because a creditor offers to purchase only a subset of available claims to block confirmation of a plan or because blocking confirmation will adversely impact the remaining creditors.

Relying heavily and expanding on the court's twenty-year old decision in Figter Ltd. v. Teachers Ins. & Annuity Ass'n of Am. (In re Figter, Ltd.), 118 F.3d 635 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 996 (1997), the court held that “[a]t a minimum, there must be evidence that a creditor is seeking 'to secure some untoward advantage over other creditors for some ulterior motive.'” 891 F.3d at 854, citing Figter, 118 F.3d at 639.

The Case

In Fagerdala, Pacific Western Bank, which held the senior secured claim against the debtor through its wholly owned subsidiary Coastline RE Holdings Corp. (Pacific Western), had its votes designated in respect of unsecured claims it acquired to block confirmation of the debtor's plan. The court held that “the bankruptcy court erred when it refused to analyze whether Pacific Western acted under an 'ulterior motive', beyond its 'mere enlightened self interest' in protecting its secured claim.” 891 F.3d at 852.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Beach Boys Songs Written Decades Ago Triggered Current Quarrel With Lawyers Image

There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.

Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Transfer Tax Implications on Real Property Leases Image

The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.