Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
'Mixed Messages': DOJ Efforts to Dismiss Qui Tam Actions
The False Claims Act (FCA), 31 U.S.C. §3729 et seq., was enacted in 1863 to punish fraud perpetrated against the government by Civil War profiteers. Since its enactment, Congress has amended the FCA to strike a balance between the FCA's dual purposes of rooting out fraud against the government and encouraging private individuals aware of such fraud to bring it to the government's attention. From 1986, the government has recovered over $59 billion in FCA settlements and judgments. See, U.S. Department of Justice, Fraud Statistics Overview (Dec. 21, 2018), (hereinafter DOJ Fraud Statistics 2018).
Background of Qui Tam Actions
The FCA provides for commencement of an action in either of two ways. First, the DOJ may bring a civil action for violation of the FCA. 31 USCS §3730(a). Second, a private person may bring a civil action on behalf of the United States for violation of the FCA. 31 USCS §3730(b). The second type of civil action, brought by the relator, is known as a qui tam action.
Qui tam actions brought by relators account for the vast majority of FCA actions. Of the $59 billion recovered by the government since 1986, $42.5 billion of that was recovered in qui tam actions. See, DOJ Fraud Statistics 2018. The number of qui tam actions filed annually has increased 20 fold since the 1986 amendment that increased awards to relators. See, DOJ Fraud Statistics 2018.
Guidance from the Granston Memo
Despite the historical trend of reduced government involvement in qui tam actions, the government is sending "mixed messages" regarding its view of FCA relators. On Jan. 10, 2018, the DOJ issued a memo "intended to provide a general framework for evaluating when to seek dismissal under section 3730(c)(2)(A) and to ensure a consistent approach to this issue across the Department." Memorandum from Michael D. Granston, Director, Commercial Litigation Branch, Fraud Section, to Attorneys, Commercial Litigation Branch, Fraud Section and Assistant U.S. Attorneys Handling False Claims Act Cases (Jan. 10, 2018) (hereinafter Granston Memo).
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
How AI Has Affected PR
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.