Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Sales of substantially all of a debtor's assets are commonplace in corporate Chapter 11 bankruptcies. In many cases, the proposed sale is the primary reason the case is filed. The sale is supervised and approved by the Bankruptcy Court. Purchasers desire to know that if the sale is consummated, they will be protected from subsequent attacks on the sale and the sale process. If court-approved bankruptcy sales are protected from subsequent attacks, presumably more bidders will participate, resulting in greater returns for the estates and creditors. Issues surrounding the finality of a bankruptcy sale were recently reviewed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit in In re Veg Liquidation, (f/k/a Allens, Inc.), Case No. 18-1786 (July 26, 2019).
The debtor in this case was Allens, Inc., an Arkansas food canning enterprise. Allens filed a Chapter 11 case in October 2013. After obtaining bankruptcy court approval for bidding and sale procedures for sale of substantially all of Allens' assets, the debtor named Seneca Foods Corp. as the stalking horse bidder. A stalking horse bid acts as an opening bid. If additional bids are submitted, an auction is held. If not, the stalking horse bid is submitted to the court for approval. The debtor accepts the highest or otherwise best bid for the assets being sold, usually after consultation with its professional advisers and the creditors' committee, lenders and others.
According to the opinion, the debtor and its advisers valued the Seneca bid at $117 million. Sager Creek Acquisition Corp., an entity formed by a group of Allens' second lienholders, submitted a bid. The final adjusted sale price of the Sager Creek bid was "just under $125 million." The debtor selected Sager Creek as the winning bidder, and the Bankruptcy Court entered an order approving the sale. The order was not appealed and the sale closed.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Stop running pilot after pilot with different tools but failing to move beyond testing. Start with business outcomes. Redesign processes and guardrails. Rethink pricing models. And then, with clarity of purpose, choose the tools that enable the future of legal work.
In an era dominated by digital communication, the simple thank you note often feels like a relic from the past. Yet, in the legal profession — a field built on relationships, trust, and reputation — the handwritten or carefully crafted thank you remains one of the most powerful gestures of professionalism. Whether addressed to a client, a mentor, a colleague, or even opposing counsel, the art of writing a thoughtful thank you note can strengthen connections and elevate your professional presence.
The firms and vendors who adapt will stop chasing page-one rankings and start competing for something more powerful: inclusion in the generative responses that shape buyer perceptions and decisions. That is the new measure of influence in a self-service world.
The firms that succeed in business development don’t just rely on a handful of rainmakers. Instead, they build systems, mindsets, and cultures that support relationship-driven growth at scale. To illustrate what this looks like in action, I sat down with three professionals who live and breathe it every day.
Generative AI is here to stay. The firms that succeed will not be those running the most pilots, but those that build deliberate strategies, align leadership, and embed AI into the way work gets done.