Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Commercial Leasing Law & StrategyFeaturesCommercial LitigationLandlord Tenant LawLitigation

Assignments and Collateral Assignments of Commercial Leases

By Terrence M. Dunn

There are differences between assignments of leases and collateral assignments of leases, and each has aspects that parties to these agreements should expect and look out for. Let's discuss some of these issues.

Commercial Lease Assignments

An assignment of lease agreement is a contract to effectuate a transfer to an assignee of title and rights to certain real property held by a lessee or tenant pursuant to a lease. There are varying reasons why a tenant may want to assign the lease. Most often, a tenant will look to assign its lease in the event that its business is failing and they can no longer pay rent, or the tenant is selling its business and the purchaser would like to take over the commercial space to operate the business (sometimes the reason may be a combination of these). While it may seem that a landlord would not object to an assignment so long as the rent is still being paid, landlords often want control over lease assignments, to protect themselves from incoming assignees that may not be credible tenants.

Assignment provisions in a commercial lease are usually coupled with subletting provisions, though the two concepts are not one in the same. When a tenant sublets its premises to a subtenant, privity of contract is not created between a sublessee and a landlord. In the case of an assignment, the assignee assumes the lease as the new tenant and privity with the landlord is created. In some cases, but not all, the assignor may be released.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

Coverage Issues Stemming from Dry Cleaner Contamination Suits Image

In recent years, there has been a growing number of dry cleaners claiming to be "organic," "green," or "eco-friendly." While that may be true with respect to some, many dry cleaners continue to use a cleaning method involving the use of a solvent called perchloroethylene, commonly known as perc. And, there seems to be an increasing number of lawsuits stemming from environmental problems associated with historic dry cleaning operations utilizing this chemical.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?

Blockchain Domains: New Developments for Brand Owners Image

Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.

Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.