Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In the Courts
Maryland's Largest Ever Ponzi-Scheme: Kevin Merrill Sentenced to 22 Years in Prison for $396 Million Consumer Debt Fraud
On October 10, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland, Kevin Merrill, 54, was sentenced to 22 years in federal prison following his guilty plea to charges of conspiracy and wire fraud in connection with a $396 million investment fraud scheme offering high returns on consumer debt products. He was ordered to pay at least $190 million in restitution by U.S. District Court Judge Richard D. Bennett, with the full amount of the victim's losses to be repaid still to be determined. An order of forfeiture was made, with the exact amount also still to be determined. Merrill's two co-conspirators and his wife have also plead guilty to charges relating to their roles in the scheme and subsequent obstruction of justice.
According to Merrill's plea agreement, the scheme, which operated from 2013 through September 2018, involved the use of fictitious sales agreements and other falsified documents, including quarterly reports and tax returns, provided by a co-conspirator Jay Ledford, 55, to induce investors to invest in consumer debt portfolios with Merrill's companies: Delmarva Capital and Global Credit Recovery. Merrill and Ledford, a certified accountant with offices in Texas, had been long term friends since meeting in 1999 before commencing the scheme in 2013. In the first year of the scheme, Merrill raised over $4 million from investors, far exceeding the $186,000 brought in by Ledford, at which point they agreed that Merrill would assume the "front man" sales role given his superior sales ability. Ledford continued to supply Merrill with the fictitious documents needed to lend credibility to the transactions, eventually bringing in a third co-conspirator in 2017, Cameron Jezierski, 28, to assist.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why So Many Great Lawyers Stink at Business Development and What Law Firms Are Doing About It
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
A Lawyer's System for Active Reading
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
Protecting Innovation in the Cyber World from Patent Trolls
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.