Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee, Nashville Division, decided that a dispute between personal managers and the country pop artist Tegan Marie should go to arbitration. 5th of July LLC v. Thomas, 3:19-cv-00994. The owners of the affiliated management companies 5th of July (based in Tennessee) and Sweety High (based in California) say they obtained "a major record contract and publishing deal at the age of thirteen" for the artist. They have since sued Tegan Marie and her parents for quantum meruit and unjust enrichment. The plaintiffs claim to have advanced "$3 million in unreimbursed funds from their company" to further the artist's career, but according to the complaint, she fired them in 2019 with three years left in the management term. The plaintiffs argue that an arbitration clause in the management agreement doesn't apply to Tegan Marie's parents because the agreement was with the artist. But Chief District Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw Jr. explained: "Under Tennessee law, it has been held that, even where the arbitration agreements do[] not expressly state that non-signatories may compel arbitration, a non party can compel arbitration if 'the arbitration agreement does not limit arbitrations only to parties to the agreement.'" The chief judge added: "Similarly, under California law, '[t]hird parties may enforce a contract with an arbitration provision … where they are intended third party beneficiaries or are assigned rights under the contract."
*****
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
On Aug. 9, 2023, Gov. Kathy Hochul introduced New York's inaugural comprehensive cybersecurity strategy. In sum, the plan aims to update government networks, bolster county-level digital defenses, and regulate critical infrastructure.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.