Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The coronavirus has fundamentally altered our lifestyles, working conditions and our consumer-driven economy. It has devastated certain retailers, crippled others and, as a consequence, caused landlords and tenants to re-think (and, in many cases to renegotiate) their short-term and long-term contractual relationships. This article seeks to examine key current issues, and offers practical advice to landlords and tenants seeking common ground to address the ongoing financial toll of the pandemic, and suggests approaches that should be considered when drafting and negotiating lease provisions such as force majeure, early termination rights and co-tenancy obligations.
Landlords and tenants are breaking established conventions to try to assure their survival. These efforts focus on the common theme of full or partial abatement of rent payments during periods of mandated closure or to afford relief due to diminished sales performance or a tenant's inability to fully utilize a leased premises. As numerous tenants in retail and office centers seek or require fiscal relief, landlords should be mindful of their loan covenants if the property is financed. Rent deferments, abatements or long term rent restructuring may trigger lender consent requirements or may simply be forbidden under applicable loan documents. Similarly, a careful analysis of loan covenants such as debt service coverage ratios and loan to value requirements should be undertaken to determine whether property that is financed remains in compliance with financing constraints and whether leases will, once modified, qualify if and when refinancing becomes necessary.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.