Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
IP News
NY District Court Adds to Confusion Surrounding Embedding
In the rapidly changing environment surrounding the legal issue of embedding (a type of inline linking that displays images and videos hosted somewhere other than the current publisher's servers), the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York has added another ruling that places the liability associated with such behavior in uncertain waters. On Nov. 2, 2020, the court dismissed plaintiff Michael Barret Boesen's Complaint against United Sports Publications, Ltd. (USP) on the grounds that it failed to allege a claim for which relief could be granted under Rule 12(b)(6). Boesen v. United Sports Publs., Ltd., No. 20-CV-1552 (ARR) (SIL), 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 203682 (E.D.N.Y. Nov. 2, 2020)
Embedding social media has been a commonplace practice for years. Indeed, it is still commonplace to see Instagram and twitter posts embedded throughout other publishers' content. Such a practice seemed safe under the Ninth Circuit's "server test" adopted in Perfect 10, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc, 508 F.3d 1146 (9th Cir. 2007). However, in recent years, the notion that embedders may be liable as copyright infringers has resurfaced as courts outside of the Ninth Circuit address the issue. See, e.g., Goldman v. Breitbart News Network LLC, 302 F. Supp. 3d 585, 590 (S.D.N.Y. 2018); Leader's Inst., LLC v. Jackson, No. 3:14-CV-3572-B, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19355, 29-30 (N.D. Tex. Nov. 22, 2017); McGucken v. Newsweek LLC, No. 19 Civ. 9617 (KPF), 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96126 (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 1, 2020).
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why So Many Great Lawyers Stink at Business Development and What Law Firms Are Doing About It
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
A Lawyer's System for Active Reading
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
Risks of “Baseball Arbitration” in Resolving Real Estate Disputes
“Baseball arbitration” refers to the process used in Major League Baseball in which if an eligible player's representative and the club ownership cannot reach a compensation agreement through negotiation, each party enters a final submission and during a formal hearing each side — player and management — presents its case and then the designated panel of arbitrators chooses one of the salary bids with no other result being allowed. This method has become increasingly popular even beyond the sport of baseball.