Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In Dr. Seuss Enterprises L.P. v. ComicMix LLC, 983 F.3d 443 (2020), a unanimous three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held in December that ComicMix's illustrated book combining elements of several Dr. Seuss children's books with characters, themes and other features of the popular sci-fi series Star Trek was not a fair use of the Seuss material from which it had admittedly been "slavishly" copied. The Ninth Circuit reversed and remanded the district court's determination of fair use and grant of summary judgment to ComicMix. (See our May 24, 2019 article in the New York Law Journal, "'Mash-Up' of Dr. Seuss and Star Trek Held Fair Use," discussing the district court's decision.) The Ninth Circuit found that all four fair use factors set forth in §107 of the Copyright Act favored Dr. Seuss Enterprises. In particular, the Ninth Circuit found that ComicMix's use was not transformative and that it would cause significant market harm to the plaintiff.
Dr. Seuss Enterprises L.P. is the successor to all rights in works created by the late Theodor S. Geisel, popularly known by his pseudonym "Dr. Seuss." One of his most popular illustrated books, Oh, the Places You'll Go! (Go!), depicts a young man on the verge of graduation, or about to embark on adventures or other new experiences. Guided by the narrator, the young man encounters both successes and obstacles along with way, but persists and ultimately succeeds ("98 and 3/4 percent guaranteed"). The imaginary journey ends, along with the book, as the narrator encourages the young man to commence his "actual" journey ("Kid You'll Move Mountains … So, Get On Your Way").
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.