Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

The Intellectual Property StrategistColumns & DepartmentsIntellectual Property

IP News

By Jeff Ginsberg and George Soussou
November 01, 2021

Federal Circuit: Case Belongs In the Northern District of California, Not Western District of Texas

On Sept. 24, 2021, a Federal Circuit panel of Judge Lourie, Judge Bryson, and Judge Taranto issued a decision in In re Juniper Networks, Inc., No. 2021-160 (Fed. Cir. 2021). In a unanimous decision, the Federal Circuit vacated the district court's denial of a motion to transfer and directed that the case be transferred under 28 U.S.C. §1404(a).

In September 2020, WSOU Investments LLC d/b/a Brazos Licensing and Development (Brazos) sued Defendant Juniper Networks, Inc. (Juniper) for patent infringement in the Western District of Texas. Juniper sought to transfer the case to the Northern District of California, arguing that "whatever ties Brazos has to this District appear to have been created for the purpose of its patent litigation activities in this District." Slip op. at 2. Juniper argued that Brazos' only business in the district is filing patent lawsuits, and that Brazos' offices and officers are primarily in California. Id. at 3. Juniper argued that the Northern District of California was a more convenient forum, as "the accused products were primarily designed, developed, marketed, and sold from Juniper's Sunnyvale headquarters within the Northern District of California." Id. Brazos argued that venue is proper in the Western District of Texas, as both parties maintain offices in the district. Id.

This premium content is locked for The Intellectual Property Strategist subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

Compliance Officers: Recent Regulatory Guidance and Enforcement Actions and Mitigating the Risk of Personal Liability Image

This article explores legal developments over the past year that may impact compliance officer personal liability.