Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The New York Appellate Division, First Department, affirmed a New York County Supreme Court decision that denied a motion to dismiss a lawsuit against an attorney sued by a personal manager for whom the lawyer had worked. Stolper v. Burbacki, 14772. Stella Stolper claimed she hired her niece Zarina Burbacki to be chief of staff and in-house counsel at Stolper's Wikked Entertainment management company. Stolper later sued Burbacki for breach of fiduciary duty, converting funds, legal malpractice and defaming Stolper. As had been explained by the county court, Stolper alleged in part: that Burbacki and Stolper's ex-husband "created their own, competing companies … for the purpose of poaching Wikked's clients and diverting business opportunities for their own benefit"; "that Ms. Burbacki advised Ms. Stolper against certain business opportunities in bad faith to further her own interests"; "that Ms. Burbacki made disparaging comments about Ms. Stolper to her sole talent management client, Mariah Carey, and to others in the entertainment industry"; and that "Burbacki consistently committed malpractice by either negligently and improperly performing legal tasks or by negligently failing to perform necessary and required legal tasks." In moving to dismiss Stolper's complaint, Burbacki argued she had been hired to work as Stolper's assistant, not her lawyer, but that even if the latter were true, that Stolper's lawsuit was barred by the settlement and mutual release of a sexual harassment suit Stolper had filed against Carey. Stolper v Mariah Carey, 651806/2018. The appellate division noted that the lower court determined the "Settlement and Mutual Release Agreement, which states in relevant part that the parties and all their respective 'lawyers, and all others who may take any interest in the matters herein released (the Stolper Releasees) and (the Carey Releasees), collectively (the Releasees), hereby fully and forever release, acquit, and discharge each other and each other's … lawyers and all others who may take any interest in the matters herein …' only released the parties and each other's lawyers." The appellate division concluded: "Contrary to defendant's contention, the record does not demonstrate that the Mutual Release Agreement between plaintiff and a third party, in which plaintiff agreed to release claims against the third party's agents including their lawyers, barred plaintiff's instant claims against defendant arising out of her alleged misconduct while she was employed as plaintiff's attorney …"
*****
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.