Call 855-808-4530 or email Gro[email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Integration and collaboration between legal technology companies is a growing phenomenon that provides opportunity for companies in all stages of the adoption life cycle. Early proponents of this tactic include Clio through the establishment of an App Directory in 2017 that fosters either one-way or two-way integration with other legal technology products as well as HighQ’s integration with Legal Anywhere prior to their acquisition by Thomson Reuters. As popularity with these integrations and collaboration attempts increases, the security risks for both companies and consumers remain prevalent. Furthermore, those concerns are inflated during events such as partnerships, integrations, and even mergers and acquisitions. Overall, the trend of legal technology companies working in concert to either overcome a mutual competitor, offer a stronger solution to existing clients, or a combination of the two is a strategic approach that is beginning to become a signature of the space.
Continue reading by getting
started with a subscription.
New U.S.-China Investment Dynamic Focuses On AI and Sensitive Technologies
By David A. Holley
An Executive Order released by the Biden Administration on Aug. 9 places increased importance on due diligence when investing in specific foreign countries. The Executive Order will regulate outbound investments in China with a focus on key technologies critical to safeguarding U.S. national security, including artificial intelligence.
New York’s Latest Cybersecurity Commitment
By Erik B. Weinick
On Aug. 9, 2023, Gov. Kathy Hochul introduced New York’s inaugural comprehensive cybersecurity strategy. In sum, the plan aims to update government networks, bolster county-level digital defenses, and regulate critical infrastructure.
Data Breach Defense: Mobilizing Against Weaponized Mass Arbitration
By Daniella Main and Brooke Bolender
Most companies have experienced or will experience a data breach. Increasingly, companies also face the risks associated with mass arbitration weaponized by the overwhelming volume of claims after a breach.
By Wim Nauwelaerts
Businesses and organizations that (regularly) transfer personal data from the EU to the U.S. should carefully assess, on a case-by-case basis, whether it makes sense to rely on the new EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework or to use one of the other data transfer tools that are available under the GDPR.