Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
SCOTUS Hears Arguments In Doctors' Good Faith Defense to Prescribing Controlled Substances
When is a doctor a doctor and when is a doctor a drug dealer? In early March, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument in two consolidated cases — Ruan v. United States and Kahn v. United States — to address where that line is drawn. Since the mid-1970s, doctors who prescribe controlled substances are not subject to prosecution for unlawful distribution under the Controlled Substances Act unless those prescriptions "fall outside the usual course of professional practice." United States v. Moore, 423 U.S. 122, 124 (1975). If a doctor prescribing controlled substances believes, mistakenly, that he or she is acting within the usual course of professional practice, that sounds like medical malpractice, but is it also a felony? The court granted certiorari in Ruan and Kahn to address a circuit split on whether a physician who prescribes controlled substances may be convicted of unlawful distribution under 21 U.S.C. §841(a)(1) without regard to whether, in good faith, that physician believed the prescriptions to fall within an acceptable course of professional practice. See, Ruan v. United States, No. 20-1410; Kahn v. United States, No. 21-5261.
The issue at stake in Ruan and Kahn seems primed to fit a pattern of recent cases where the Supreme Court has addressed interpretations of criminal statutes that threaten to sweep too far. In cases like Bond v. United States, 572 U.S. 844 (2014), Yates v. United States, 574 U.S. 528 (2015), and most recently in Van Buren v. United States, 141 S. Ct. 1648 (2021), the Supreme Court narrowly has interpreted broadly written criminal statutes based on a close — sometimes strained — analysis of statutory language. In these cases, the court, at times, has acknowledged the larger problem of overcriminalization via statutes susceptible of sweeping in innocent or de minimis conduct, but nevertheless anchors its decisions in the text — without express reliance on broader judicial doctrines. The parties' arguments and the justices' comments during oral argument in Ruan and Kahn, however, hint at the possibility that the court may break its recent pattern and delineate the boundary between medical malpractice and felony drug dealing on a more far-reaching doctrinal foundation — the bedrock criminal law principle that each statutory element distinguishing lawful from unlawful conduct must be done with mens rea.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why So Many Great Lawyers Stink at Business Development and What Law Firms Are Doing About It
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
A Lawyer's System for Active Reading
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
Protecting Innovation in the Cyber World from Patent Trolls
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.