Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Cybersecurity Law & StrategyFeaturesCybersecurityTechnology Media and Telecom

Under Shared Responsibility Cloud Model, Data Owners Retain Control of Access and Data

By Catherine Castaldo, Therese Craparo and Christine Gartland
June 01, 2022

As data volumes continue to experience exponential growth, businesses of all sizes — even those that traditionally resisted the change — are embracing cloud models. From a business perspective, the transition to the cloud allows businesses to manage data, reduce costs, and take advantage of the efficiencies and analytics offered by third-party cloud providers. From a legal perspective, the cloud introduces a unique shared responsibility model that many businesses are only now coming to appreciate; specifically, although the cloud provider may house the data and provide functionality for access and data security controls, the legal obligations remain the responsibility of the business procuring these services. In fact, with the two most important controls — access and data — responsibility rests wholly with the business procuring the service.

Comparison to Traditional Models

In the shared responsibility model, the business does not have full dominion over its software, hardware, and threat landscape — it's connected within the cloud model and stored on someone else's servers. A business's most sensitive data may be transferred to and stored by thousands of different cloud providers, each with their own unique processes and functionality that are typically designed for mass use, rather than bespoke to the business's needs. There are also a variety of cloud computing services, including Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS), Platform-as-a-Service (PaaS), and Software-as-a-Service (SaaS). For simplicity, this article refers to all cloud computing models as the "cloud"; however, appropriate controls may depend on the cloud model and type of technology. This means that, in order to assess, implement and manage appropriate controls, the business must conduct an individualized assessment of each cloud provider. In effect, the shared responsibility model is a decentralized model that requires customization for each cloud service used by the business.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Why So Many Great Lawyers Stink at Business Development and What Law Firms Are Doing About It Image

Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

A Lawyer's System for Active Reading Image

Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.

Protecting Innovation in the Cyber World from Patent Trolls Image

With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.