Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Bit Parts

By Stan Soocher
July 01, 2022

Arbitration Clause in Prior Dispute Settlement Doesn't Apply to Cheaters Uncensored Current Copyright Dispute

The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division, denied a motion to compel arbitration of a copyright infringement lawsuit over rights to the reality TV program Cheaters Uncensored. Bobby Goldstein Productions Inc. (BGP) v. Habeeb, 3:21-CV-1924. Bobby Goldstein created the TV show Cheaters and formed the production company BGP. Tommy Habeeb, who Goldstein collaborated with, later sued Goldstein himself in Texas state court over ownership rights to Cheaters. A 2005 settlement of the suit gave Habeeb "the exclusive right to approach potential pay-per-view and premium channel outlets and negotiate the terms of any agreement to broadcast Cheaters Uncensored" but deemed Goldstein "owner of all copyright in any and all footage of Cheaters that will be the basis for Cheaters Uncensored and will own the copyright in all episodes of Cheaters Uncensored." In 2021, BGP sued Habeeb, alleging Habeeb didn't have a "license to make copies of the Episodes on the Internet or to make the Episodes and/or derivative works thereof available for performance or display by the public on the Internet." Habeeb moved for arbitration of the copyright dispute under the 2005 settlement. First, Senior Northern District Judge A. Joe Fish agreed with BGP that the settlement agreement "resolved a lawsuit between Mr. Habeeb and Mr. Goldstein. BGP was neither a party to the lawsuit nor a signatory to the settlement agreement; indeed, the terms of the settlement agreement do not even mention BGP, and there is no evidence that the parties intended the settlement agreement to apply to BGP." And even if it did, Senior District Judge Fish found: "The court agrees with BGP that the '[d]efendants make no attempt to provide any argument — much less evidence — to demonstrate that their infringing internet-based copyright violations relate to negotiations with any pay-per-view or premium channel outlet."

*****

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
New York's Latest Cybersecurity Commitment Image

On Aug. 9, 2023, Gov. Kathy Hochul introduced New York's inaugural comprehensive cybersecurity strategy. In sum, the plan aims to update government networks, bolster county-level digital defenses, and regulate critical infrastructure.

The Bankruptcy Hotline Image

Recent cases of importance to your practice.

The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

How AI Has Affected PR Image

When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.

CLE Shouldn't Be the Only Mandatory Training for Attorneys Image

Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.