Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In the wake of the Supreme Court's landmark decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, issues surrounding the privacy and security of health information have been top of mind for health care providers, consumers, and legislators. The Department of Health and Human Services Office for Civil Rights (OCR), the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), and the California Attorney General have all released guidance addressing the collection, storage, and use of sensitive information concerning reproductive health, signaling increased enforcement in this area. Proposed federal legislation would impose additional obligations on providers of apps and devices that store health and location data. In light of the evolving legal and regulatory landscape, app developers and their counsel should examine developers' privacy and security practices and take steps to safeguard sensitive data related to reproductive health.
OCR recently released guidance aimed at health care providers covered by the HIPAA Privacy Rule and their business associates. It clarifies that while the Privacy Rule permits certain disclosures of protected health information (PHI) without an individual's authorization that are not directly related to health care, these disclosures are subject to certain limitations. In particular, a disclosure of PHI that is required by another law is limited to "a mandate contained in law that compels an entity to make a use or disclosure of PHI and that is enforceable in a court of law," and the entity can only disclose the information that is required to be disclosed under that law. The guidance also addresses disclosures for law enforcement purposes (generally such a disclosure would be a breach of unsecured PHI unless it is made pursuant to "a court order or other mandate enforceable in a court of law"), as well as permitted disclosures made to avert a serious threat to health or safety (generally, these would not include disclosures concerning an individual's interest in or attempt to receive an abortion or other reproductive health care).
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.
A defendant in a patent infringement suit may, during discovery and prior to a <i>Markman</i> hearing, compel the plaintiff to produce claim charts, claim constructions, and element-by-element infringement analyses.