Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

How to Avoid the Claim Cap Becoming a 'Claim Trap'

By Sherry Millman and Genna Grossman
October 01, 2022

When a tenant files for bankruptcy, the commercial landlord is faced with the often worrisome prospect that its unexpired lease may be rejected in the bankruptcy proceedings. A tenant's right to reject a lease, and thereby disavow its future lease obligations, does not exist outside of bankruptcy and often plays a large role in its decision to file for bankruptcy. During the period that the debtor tenant is determining whether or not to assume a non-residential lease, the Bankruptcy Code requires it to timely perform the obligations under the lease which arise after the commencement of the bankruptcy case. See, 11 U.S.C. §365(d)(3)(A). However, that is not the case for lease obligations related to time periods occurring after a lease is rejected. The Bankruptcy Code creates a fiction that rejection of a lease, although effectuated post-petition, constitutes a breach which occurred immediately prior to the filing of the bankruptcy petition. See, 11 U.S.C. §365(g)(1).

As a result, if an unexpired commercial lease of real property is rejected, the landlord will be left only with a pre-prepetition unsecured claim to be asserted in the bankruptcy for damages resulting from such rejection and, like other pre-petition unsecured creditors, with the attendant uncertainty about recoveries on its claim. However, unlike most other unsecured creditors, a commercial landlord is also subject to a limitation on the amount of its claim under §502(b)(6) of the Bankruptcy Code, even before it gets to the recovery stage on its claim. This provision disallows any amounts claimed by landlords for damages resulting from the termination of a lease of real property which are in excess of "the rent reserved by such lease, without acceleration, for the greater of one year, or 15 percent, not to exceed three years, of the remaining term of such lease, following the earlier of [the petition date and the date the landlord repossessed, or the tenant surrendered, the premises]" plus unpaid rents due under such lease, without acceleration, on such earlier date. See, 11 U.S.C. §502(b)(6). The formula has proven to be a brain teaser of sorts with courts and commentators grappling over, among other things, what constitutes rent for these purposes, as well as how the 15% is calculated.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Why So Many Great Lawyers Stink at Business Development and What Law Firms Are Doing About It Image

Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

A Lawyer's System for Active Reading Image

Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.

Protecting Innovation in the Cyber World from Patent Trolls Image

With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.