Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
When a tenant files for bankruptcy, the commercial landlord is faced with the often worrisome prospect that its unexpired lease may be rejected in the bankruptcy proceedings. A tenant's right to reject a lease, and thereby disavow its future lease obligations, does not exist outside of bankruptcy and often plays a large role in its decision to file for bankruptcy. During the period that the debtor tenant is determining whether or not to assume a non-residential lease, the Bankruptcy Code requires it to timely perform the obligations under the lease which arise after the commencement of the bankruptcy case. See, 11 U.S.C. §365(d)(3)(A). However, that is not the case for lease obligations related to time periods occurring after a lease is rejected. The Bankruptcy Code creates a fiction that rejection of a lease, although effectuated post-petition, constitutes a breach which occurred immediately prior to the filing of the bankruptcy petition. See, 11 U.S.C. §365(g)(1).
As a result, if an unexpired commercial lease of real property is rejected, the landlord will be left only with a pre-prepetition unsecured claim to be asserted in the bankruptcy for damages resulting from such rejection and, like other pre-petition unsecured creditors, with the attendant uncertainty about recoveries on its claim. However, unlike most other unsecured creditors, a commercial landlord is also subject to a limitation on the amount of its claim under §502(b)(6) of the Bankruptcy Code, even before it gets to the recovery stage on its claim. This provision disallows any amounts claimed by landlords for damages resulting from the termination of a lease of real property which are in excess of "the rent reserved by such lease, without acceleration, for the greater of one year, or 15 percent, not to exceed three years, of the remaining term of such lease, following the earlier of [the petition date and the date the landlord repossessed, or the tenant surrendered, the premises]" plus unpaid rents due under such lease, without acceleration, on such earlier date. See, 11 U.S.C. §502(b)(6). The formula has proven to be a brain teaser of sorts with courts and commentators grappling over, among other things, what constitutes rent for these purposes, as well as how the 15% is calculated.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.