Another Appellate Court Vacates A Bankruptcy Court Contempt Judgment

Relevance

Appellate courts have not been afraid to overturn bankruptcy court sanctions. In re Gravel, 6 F. 4th 503, 508, 512-13 (2d Cir. 2021) (2-1) (bankruptcy court's punitive sanctions order vacated and reversed; "… a contempt order is warranted only where the party has notice of the order, the order is clear and unambiguous, and the proof of noncompliance is clear and convincing"; "… a bankruptcy court cannot hold a party in contempt for violating an order that is subject to varying interpretations.") cert denied. __ U.S. __ (June 13, 2022); Beckhart v. Newrez LLC, 31 F.4th 274, 275, 278 (4th Cir. 2022) ("neither the bankruptcy court nor the district court applied" the current standard for holding "a creditor in civil contempt" for violating a "confusing" Chapter 11 confirmation order; "any sanction that may ultimately be imposed must be supported – both in type and in amount — by a sufficient evidentiary record."); In re DeGennaro, III, 2020 WL 7231945,*9 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 8, 2020) (bankruptcy court sanctions vacated because of an abuse of discretion; order not "clear and unambiguous"; no "clear and convincing evidence of non-compliance" with order "whose terms cannot now be created"; no willful compliance with unclear order; no advance warning of possible contempt sanction; sanctions imposed … too "quickly and without sufficient explanation."). Bankruptcy courts may still sanction parties, but their "contempt power… is narrowly circumscribed." Gravel, 6 F. 4th at 511, quoting Perez v. Danbury Hosp., 347 F.3d 419, 423 (2d Cir. 2003).