Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

The Bankruptcy StrategistFeaturesBankruptcyLitigation

Successor Liability Claims Constitute a 'Property Interest' for Purposes of a 363 Sale In Bankruptcy

By Rudolph J. Di Massa Jr. and Malcolm Bates
December 01, 2022

In In re Norrenberns Foods, Case No. 21-30825, (Bankr. S.D. Ill. July 8, 2022), the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Illinois had occasion to rule on a creditor's objection to the sale of a debtor's assets. The debtor had proposed that, under Section 363(f) of the Bankruptcy Code, the sale be free and clear of any third-party interest in the assets. The creditor, a multi-employer pension fund, held successor liability claims against the debtor and asserted that those claims could not be extinguished through a sale of assets under Section 363. After a thorough analysis of the claims asserted by debtor and creditor, the bankruptcy court overruled the creditor's objections and allowed the sale to be consummated.

Background

The debtor in this case, Norrenberns Foods, Inc., operated a group of grocery stores in southern Illinois. The debtor became increasingly unable to compete with the large corporate grocery stores moving into the area, and over time was ultimately forced to close all of its stores but one, known as "Tom's Supermarket." While the debtor operated this group of grocery stores, it was party to certain collective bargaining agreements administered by the United Food and Commercial Workers Unions and Employers Midwest Pension Fund. The fund is a multiemployer pension fund that provides retirement, disability and death benefits to retail food employees affiliated with certain unions, including the unions then representing workers at the debtor's stores. As these stores began closing, their cumulative union pension withdrawal liabilities were passed through to the debtor's remaining stores, until only Tom's Supermarket remained.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Why So Many Great Lawyers Stink at Business Development and What Law Firms Are Doing About It Image

Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

A Lawyer's System for Active Reading Image

Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.

Protecting Innovation in the Cyber World from Patent Trolls Image

With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.