Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York dismissed a lawsuit by filmmaker Joshua Newton against Ron Meyer, former Vice Chairman of NBCUniversal Media (NBCU). Newton v. Meyer (22 Civ. 540). Newton alleged Meyer acted as his agent to help Newton find funding interest in two of Newton's scripts, including "Nicole & O.J." But according to the court: "All the while, Meyer was allegedly hiding inappropriate relationships that he and other Hollywood executives had with an actress who was the anticipated star of Newton's ['Nicole & O.J.'] After details of those relationships became public, all investor interest in 'Nicole & O.J.' vanished, and the film remains unmade to this day." Newton sued Meyer alleging breach of fiduciary duty, fraudulent inducement and negligent misrepresentation. Dismissing Newton's complaint with prejudice, Southern District Judge John P. Cronan concluded: "Newton fails to adequately allege the formation of a fiduciary relationship, that any of Meyer's statements were false or materially misleading, or that any reliance on Meyer's statements was reasonable." On the first claim, District Judge Cronan explained: "In this case, Newton acknowledges that no formal talent agreement existed between him and Meyer … Rather, Newton alleges that 'Meyer, acting in the course and scope of his actual or apparent authority on behalf of NBCUniversal as its Vice Chairman, agreed to represent Plaintiff as his actual or de facto talent agent to obtain financing and distribution of Newton's films.' … [But] Newton does not allege that Meyer had an explicit or implicit 'power to bind' Newton, 'power to negotiate' on behalf of Newton, 'power to affect any legal relations of' Newton, or 'power to do anything except find and introduce prospect[ive]' investors to Newton."
*****
Stan Soocher is Editor-in-Chief of Entertainment Law & Finance and Professor Emeritus of Music & Entertainment Industry Studies at the University of Colorado Denver. For more info: https://www.stansoocher.com.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.