Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Bit Parts

By Stan Soocher
April 01, 2023

Script Writer Newton's Funding-Help Lawsuit Against Former NBCUniversal Vice-Chair Meyer Is Dismissed

The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York dismissed a lawsuit by filmmaker Joshua Newton against Ron Meyer, former Vice Chairman of NBCUniversal Media (NBCU). Newton v. Meyer (22 Civ. 540). Newton alleged Meyer acted as his agent to help Newton find funding interest in two of Newton's scripts, including "Nicole & O.J." But according to the court: "All the while, Meyer was allegedly hiding inappropriate relationships that he and other Hollywood executives had with an actress who was the anticipated star of Newton's ['Nicole & O.J.'] After details of those relationships became public, all investor interest in 'Nicole & O.J.' vanished, and the film remains unmade to this day." Newton sued Meyer alleging breach of fiduciary duty, fraudulent inducement and negligent misrepresentation. Dismissing Newton's complaint with prejudice, Southern District Judge John P. Cronan concluded: "Newton fails to adequately allege the formation of a fiduciary relationship, that any of Meyer's statements were false or materially misleading, or that any reliance on Meyer's statements was reasonable." On the first claim, District Judge Cronan explained: "In this case, Newton acknowledges that no formal talent agreement existed between him and Meyer … Rather, Newton alleges that 'Meyer, acting in the course and scope of his actual or apparent authority on behalf of NBCUniversal as its Vice Chairman, agreed to represent Plaintiff as his actual or de facto talent agent to obtain financing and distribution of Newton's films.' … [But] Newton does not allege that Meyer had an explicit or implicit 'power to bind' Newton, 'power to negotiate' on behalf of Newton, 'power to affect any legal relations of' Newton, or 'power to do anything except find and introduce prospect[ive]' investors to Newton."

*****

Stan Soocher is Editor-in-Chief of Entertainment Law & Finance and Professor Emeritus of Music & Entertainment Industry Studies at the University of Colorado Denver. For more info: https://www.stansoocher.com.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Why So Many Great Lawyers Stink at Business Development and What Law Firms Are Doing About It Image

Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

A Lawyer's System for Active Reading Image

Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.

Protecting Innovation in the Cyber World from Patent Trolls Image

With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.