Appellate Court Reverses Chapter 11 Confirmation Order Based on Faulty Tax Ruling

Relevance

Chapter 11 debtors routinely move to dismiss appeals from confirmation orders on mootness grounds, as was done in Levandowski I. The appellate courts have had to wrestle with the equitable mootness issue in the past decade as a result. See, e.g., In re Charter Communications, Inc., 691 F.3d 476, 482 (2d Cir. 2012) ("In this circuit, an appeal is presumed equitably moot where the debtor's plan of reorganization has been substantially consummated."); contra, In re Transwest Resort Properties, Inc., 801 F.3d 1161, 1169 (9th Cir. 2015); ("Reorganized debtors argue that substantial consummation creates a presumption that the appeal is moot …. Our Circuit's articulation of the equitable mootness test, however has not included such a presumption …. We must still consider whether, despite substantial consummation, we can fashion effective relief."); In re One 2 One Communications, LLC, 805 F.3d 428, 434 (3d Cir. 2015) ("The party seeking dismissal bears the burden to demonstrate that, weighing the relevant factors, dismissal is warranted."); In re VeroBlue Farms USA, Inc., 6 F. 4th 884, 885-884 (8th Cir. 2021)) (application of equitable mootness doctrine "exceptional"; remanded for further "inquiry").