Lease Terminations As Fraudulent Transfers

Pazzo

The debtors in Pazzo had intended to abandon their property, receiving the lessor's ample notice of termination of a lease and repurchase option. Their "radio silence" after receiving warning notices from the lessor, based on their non-payment of taxes and utility bills, their lapsed liquor and food licenses, their non-existent employment force and multiple maintenance issues, "provided ample grounds for the finding that the debtors had intended to vacate the premises." On these facts, the bankruptcy court properly held the lease to have been abandoned. Indeed, the debtors knew that the lessor considered the lease and option to be terminated, but they never responded. They made no claim of an interest in the lease or the option until after filing a bankruptcy petition several months later. Although the purchase option was a "future contingent interest protected under the Bankruptcy Code," the debtors' "failure to convert this contingent interest into actual ownership did not amount to" disposing or parting with their property "interest." Id. at *4. Thus, the debtors "did not transfer their option rights," but only "failed to pursue a business opportunity" by allowing that property interest to lapse. They no longer had a property interest before they even commenced their bankruptcy case. Termination of the option was therefore not a "transfer" under Code §548(a)(1)(B).