Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
As an in-house counsel at a company specializing in litigation analytics, I've had a front-row seat to the transformative impact that data-driven decision-making can have in the legal field, particularly in the realm of class action litigation. The world of law, often perceived as steeped in tradition and precedent, is undergoing a quiet revolution. The rise of big data and advanced analytics has ushered in a new era. The need for precise, accurate, and comprehensive data analysis is paramount in class action litigation, where the stakes are high and the complexities manifold. At the heart of this change is the rising tide of litigation analytics — a tool that is reshaping how legal professionals approach, strategize, and ultimately win class action cases.
Class action litigation presents unique challenges and opportunities. These cases often involve large groups of individuals, significant financial stakes, and complex legal issues. While invaluable, traditional legal approaches can benefit immensely from integrating data-driven insights. This is where litigation analytics comes into play, offering a new lens through which to view the legal landscape.
In the high-stakes world of class action lawsuits, access to detailed, accurate, and comprehensive data is not just an advantage but a necessity. Litigation analytics offers legal professionals insights into various aspects of class action cases, such as historical case outcomes, judge behaviors, and settlement patterns. This data is invaluable for crafting successful litigation strategies and anticipating the direction of a case.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.