Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
As an in-house counsel at a company specializing in litigation analytics, I've had a front-row seat to the transformative impact that data-driven decision-making can have in the legal field, particularly in the realm of class action litigation. The world of law, often perceived as steeped in tradition and precedent, is undergoing a quiet revolution. The rise of big data and advanced analytics has ushered in a new era. The need for precise, accurate, and comprehensive data analysis is paramount in class action litigation, where the stakes are high and the complexities manifold. At the heart of this change is the rising tide of litigation analytics — a tool that is reshaping how legal professionals approach, strategize, and ultimately win class action cases.
|Class action litigation presents unique challenges and opportunities. These cases often involve large groups of individuals, significant financial stakes, and complex legal issues. While invaluable, traditional legal approaches can benefit immensely from integrating data-driven insights. This is where litigation analytics comes into play, offering a new lens through which to view the legal landscape.
|In the high-stakes world of class action lawsuits, access to detailed, accurate, and comprehensive data is not just an advantage but a necessity. Litigation analytics offers legal professionals insights into various aspects of class action cases, such as historical case outcomes, judge behaviors, and settlement patterns. This data is invaluable for crafting successful litigation strategies and anticipating the direction of a case.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
A novel legal self-help technique to secure artificial intelligence data and programs is known as Poisoning AI. This technique involves modifying the AI algorithm to intentionally produce specific erroneous results.
In a recent decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit addressed the issue of whether purchasing market competitors’ search engine keyword terms, known as “conquesting,” constitutes trademark infringement.
The DOJ has proposed a rule that would regulate certain transactions involving bulk sensitive personal data. The rule would implement a complex regulatory framework, with civil and criminal enforcement, that is similar to sanctions and export licensing regimes. It also implicates federal cybersecurity requirements, government contracting and CFIUS actions.
The legal industry is at an inflection point, grappling with challenges that range from rising client demands to technological disruption. There are five critical areas where firms can take a proactive, strategic approach, including actionable insights and recommendations for navigating 2025 and beyond.
The Second Circuit’s decision is notable in that it signals a reversal of the recent trend of dismissals of VPPA claims in courts across the country and could trigger a significant increase in VPPA lawsuits. Although organizations have grappled with VPPA claims for several years, this decision is another red flag to organizations to take immediate steps and ensure compliance with privacy laws to mitigate the risks of VPPA claims.