Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The ripple effects of technological advancement are spreading farther and faster every day. Legal professionals are feeling the pressure acutely, particularly in the way that data risk and artificial intelligence (AI) are impacting the role of general counsel and their teams.
Recent research based on interviews with chief legal officers around the globe, as reported in The General Counsel Report 2024, found that the increased scope and scale of risk now facing corporations is driving change in how legal teams set their strategies, leverage technology and manage operations. Notably, 87% of participants expect risk to increase in the coming year — with regulatory and global compliance challenges emerging as the number one issue for the first time in the five-year history of the report. In parallel, feelings of preparedness declined in every risk category studied.
There were several areas discussed in the report that stood out as significant indicators of current and impending change. These included the following:
While general counsel are facing a surge of demand in challenging areas and largely feel they are underprepared to address critical issues, they have not been stagnant. Nearly every respondent in the study demonstrated unique ways that their legal departments are responding with decisive action. Many are embracing innovation and a healthy openness to making broad changes in how they approach and prioritize department responsibilities. This general counsel acceptance of innovation and adoption of technology goes to the heart of the trends that have been developing over the past five years — the general counsel's office is a business center, not merely the "Department of No."
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.