Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
LOVO, an artificial intelligence company focused on voice generation, has been hit with a proposed class action lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, with the plaintiff voice actors arguing they have not been properly compensated for the use of their voices. Lehrman v. LOVO Inc., 1-24-cv-03770.
The law firm Pollock Cohen represents the plaintiffs in the suit, who say they did not know the defendant AI company LOVO, based in Berkeley, would be using their voices in its generated voice services and did not consent to such use.
One plaintiff, Paul Lehrman, was paid $1,200 through the freelance website Fiverr for voice recordings and was told the work would be used only for "research purposes," according to the complaint. The other plaintiff Linnea Sage was paid $400 through Fiverr and was told her recordings were "test scripts for radio ads," also according to the complaint.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
End of year collections are crucial for law firms because they allow them to maximize their revenue for the year, impacting profitability, partner distributions and bonus calculations by ensuring outstanding invoices are paid before the year closes, which is especially important for meeting financial targets and managing cash flow throughout the firm.
Law firms and companies in the professional services space must recognize that clients are conducting extensive online research before making contact. Prospective buyers are no longer waiting for meetings with partners or business development professionals to understand the firm's offerings. Instead, they are seeking out information on their own, and they want to do it quickly and efficiently.
Through a balanced approach that combines incentives with accountability, firms can navigate the complexities of returning to the office while maintaining productivity and morale.
The paradigm of legal administrative support within law firms has undergone a remarkable transformation over the last decade. But this begs the question: are the changes to administrative support successful, and do law firms feel they are sufficiently prepared to meet future business needs?
Counsel should include in its analysis of a case the taxability of the anticipated and sought after damages as the tax effect could be substantial.