Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Ethical Obligations and Risks of Engaging a Temporary Attorney
It is not uncommon for practitioners and law firms to employ the services of temporary (or contract) attorneys as the need may arise in contemporary practice. Employers often turn to temporary lawyers to address a variety of needs including workload variations, special projects, matters requiring a unique or particular skillset, and general assistance with such tasks as document review and the drafting of legal memoranda, among other things. As one federal court explained, "economics is the principal reason for emergence of lawyer temping because it permits a firm to service client needs during particularly busy periods by engaging an experienced attorney, without incurring the expense of hiring a permanent employee." See, Carlson v. Xerox, 596 F. Supp. 2d 400, 409 (D. Conn. 2009) (internal citations omitted). This article discusses the ethical obligations and associated risks that flow from engaging the services of a temporary attorney, including areas such as billing for services and adequate disclosure to clients.
Temporary Lawyers In Context
A generally accepted definition of the term "temporary lawyer" includes an attorney hired "to work on a single matter or a number of different matters, depending upon the firm's staffing needs and whether the temporary attorney has special expertise not otherwise available to the firm." See, Newby v. Enron, 586 F.Supp. 2d 732, 783 n 64 (S.D. Tex. 2008) (Observing that the hiring of a contract or temporary attorney is a common practice in law firms today); see also Takeda Chemical Industries v. Mylan Laboratories, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19614 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 21, 2007) ("In complex litigation, contract attorneys are routinely used by well-established law firms who supervise their work."). Temporary attorneys are typically employed for a "limited period or purpose" and do not include someone who "is a part time employee of a firm or one who is employed full time but without contemplation of permanent employment, who works only for the employing firm." See, Colo. Formal Ethics Op. 105 (May 22, 1999).
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why So Many Great Lawyers Stink at Business Development and What Law Firms Are Doing About It
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
A Lawyer's System for Active Reading
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
Protecting Innovation in the Cyber World from Patent Trolls
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.