Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

The Bankruptcy StrategistFeaturesBankruptcyLitigation

Avoiding Double-Dipping: U.S. Trustee Fees and Creditor Trusts

By Nicole M. Sweeney and Megan M. Wasson
September 01, 2024

The U.S. Trustee has begun to advance a novel argument that penalizes the beneficiaries of unsecured creditor trusts: that U.S. Trustee disbursement fees apply not only to disbursements made by debtors, but also disbursements made by creditor trusts formed under bankruptcy plans (commonly referred to as "GUC Trusts" or "Litigation Trusts"). Under 28 U.S.C. §1930(a)(6), the U.S. Trustee is entitled to a quarterly fee on any "disbursements" made by a debtor while its bankruptcy case remains open. While section 1930(a)(6) does not specify which entity must make these "disbursements," section 1930(a) indicates that "the parties commencing a case under title 11" must pay the enumerated fees.

There is little dispute that the transfer of assets by a debtor to a GUC Trust is a disbursement triggering U.S. Trustee fees. However, the U.S. Trustee has recently taken the position that GUC Trusts should be required to pay fees on account of their own disbursements to creditors, on the grounds that contingent assets (like litigation claims) are not "disbursed" when they are transferred to a GUC Trust, but rather when their proceeds are eventually distributed to creditors. Notably, the Bankruptcy Code does not define "disbursements," and this ambiguity paired with the lack of specificity in section 1930(a)(6) form the crux of the U.S. Trustee's argument.

This premium content is locked for The Bankruptcy Strategist subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.

Compliance Officers: Recent Regulatory Guidance and Enforcement Actions and Mitigating the Risk of Personal Liability Image

This article explores legal developments over the past year that may impact compliance officer personal liability.

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.