Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Precautions Defense Counsel Should Consider In Making Attorney Proffers
For good reason, ordinarily courts are reluctant to admit statements of counsel as evidence in a criminal trial. Rulings in two recent high-profile local cases defy the common wisdom. In U.S. v. Menendez, No. 23-cr-490 (S.D.N.Y.), the prosecution of New Jersey Sen. Bob Menendez and others on bribery and related charges, the court admitted a PowerPoint presentation Menendez's counsel made to prosecutors prior to indictment as part of an attorney proffer. The government offered the presentation in support of obstruction charges included in a subsequent indictment against the senator. Not surprisingly, the government's aggressive step has gotten the attention of the defense bar. Although the government has indicated that it expects such uses of attorney proffers to be rare, as discussed below, its action is troubling and not unique. The government's step suggests precautions that defense counsel should consider in making attorney proffers.
In U.S. v. Coburn & Schwartz, No. 19-cr-120 (D.N.J.), a District of New Jersey prosecution of former senior executives of Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation (Cognizant) on Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) charges based on the alleged bribery of Indian government officials, the court upheld a defense subpoena seeking trial testimony from the prominent law firm that conducted an internal investigation in the matter. The ruling confirms the well-recognized risk that presenting information regarding an internal investigation to prosecutors waives any privilege regarding what was presented. The ruling also illustrates how a narrowly tailored demand for testimony about what an internal investigation failed to find can be a potentially valuable tool for defense counsel.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
New York's Latest Cybersecurity Commitment
On Aug. 9, 2023, Gov. Kathy Hochul introduced New York's inaugural comprehensive cybersecurity strategy. In sum, the plan aims to update government networks, bolster county-level digital defenses, and regulate critical infrastructure.
Law Firms are Reducing Redundant Real Estate by Bringing Support Services Back to the Office
A trend analysis of the benefits and challenges of bringing back administrative, word processing and billing services to law offices.
Bit Parts
Summary Judgment Denied Defendant in Declaratory Action by Producer of To Kill a Mockingbird Broadway Play Seeking Amateur Theatrical Rights
Risks of “Baseball Arbitration” in Resolving Real Estate Disputes
“Baseball arbitration” refers to the process used in Major League Baseball in which if an eligible player's representative and the club ownership cannot reach a compensation agreement through negotiation, each party enters a final submission and during a formal hearing each side — player and management — presents its case and then the designated panel of arbitrators chooses one of the salary bids with no other result being allowed. This method has become increasingly popular even beyond the sport of baseball.