Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
An axiom of patent licensing is that a patent owner cannot receive royalty payments for post-expiration use of its patented technology. However, in exercising their rights to freedom of contract, parties to an IP license may desire flexibility in how they structure payments for the underlying licensed IP. For example, the parties may be willing to trade upfront payments and higher royalty rates for an extended life of royalty payments at a lower royalty rate. How do you determine if the ongoing royalty obligations that extend beyond the life of underlying patent protection, even if agreed to by the contracting parties, are enforceable? A recent decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit shows what types of license arrangements pass the test.
The dispute in Ares Trading SA v. Dyax Corp., 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40484, revolves around multiple players involved in a process of drug development, each of whom is trying to get a piece of the ultimate pie: revenue based on sales of the resulting drug product. In this case, the drug product was an antibody-based cancer therapeutic that was discovered using patented antibody-screening technology owned by Cambridge Antibody Technology (CAT). CAT licensed its patents to companies including Dyax to perform antibody screening in exchange for royalty payments based on the subsequent sale of the developed drug product.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
On Aug. 9, 2023, Gov. Kathy Hochul introduced New York's inaugural comprehensive cybersecurity strategy. In sum, the plan aims to update government networks, bolster county-level digital defenses, and regulate critical infrastructure.
A trend analysis of the benefits and challenges of bringing back administrative, word processing and billing services to law offices.
Summary Judgment Denied Defendant in Declaratory Action by Producer of To Kill a Mockingbird Broadway Play Seeking Amateur Theatrical Rights
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.