Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

The Bankruptcy StrategistFeaturesBankruptcyContractsLitigation

Second Circuit Reinforces Bankruptcy Code Settlement Payment Safe Harbor

By Michael L. Cook
November 01, 2024

The Second Circuit affirmed the lower courts' judgment that a "transfer made … in connection with a securities contract … by a qualifying financial institution" was entitled "to the protection of [Bankruptcy] Code §546 (e)'s safe harbor, which pre-empts the trustee's state-law fraudulent [transfer] claims." In re Boston Generating, LLC, 2024 WL 4234886 (2d Cir. Sept. 19, 2024). The lower courts had dismissed the liquidating trustee's claims because Code §546 (e)'s safe harbor provision had preempted the state law fraudulent transfer claims, relying on binding precedent. In re Tribune Co. Fraudulent Conv. Litig., 946 F.3d. 66 (2d Cir. 2019) (Tribune II), cert. denied, 141 S. Ct. 2552 (2021) (Creditors could not circumvent §546(e) safe harbor by suing under state law). More significant, though, was the court's explanation of why: a) the payment here was part of a securities contract; and why b) the debtor parent and its debtor subsidiary were "each a 'financial institution' under Bankruptcy Code (Code) §101(22)(A)."

Facts

The debtor corporate parent, a holding company, had used its debtor subsidiary to finance its so-called "Leveraged Recap Transaction." In effect, the parent purchased equity from its members using the cash borrowed by its subsidiary. The debtor subsidiary received loan proceeds from its lenders and promptly sent the proceeds from its bank account (approximately $708 million) to its parent's bank account for transfer to the selling members. The trustee sought to recover the $708 million from the member defendants "who received payments for their equity securities pursuant to the Leveraged Recap Transaction." Id. at*1. He alleged an "initial transfer" with $708 million from the subsidiary and a "subsequent transfer" of those funds to the defendant members. The trustee admittedly split the transaction to get around Code §546(e), arguing that the initial subsidiary-to-parent transfer was not a settlement payment and not made as part of a "securities contract."

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

Judge Rules Shaquille O'Neal Will Face Securities Lawsuit for Promotion, Sale of NFTs Image

A federal district court in Miami, FL, has ruled that former National Basketball Association star Shaquille O'Neal will have to face a lawsuit over his promotion of unregistered securities in the form of cryptocurrency tokens and that he was a "seller" of these unregistered securities.

Why So Many Great Lawyers Stink at Business Development and What Law Firms Are Doing About It Image

Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?

A Lawyer's System for Active Reading Image

Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.

Blockchain Domains: New Developments for Brand Owners Image

Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.