Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Unchargeable Conduct
In April 2024, the U.S. Sentencing Commission took action to end a controversial practice known as "acquitted conduct" sentencing. Under the previous rule, a defendant who was convicted of one charge but acquitted of another could still face punishment for the acquitted conduct, so long as the government could convince the judge at sentencing that it was more likely than not that the defendant did in fact commit the crime. You read that right — the old rule meant that "not guilty" at trial did not always mean "not guilty" when it came time for sentencing. The commission has rightfully done away with this practice, at least at the federal level.
But what about a case in which a defendant is facing increased punishment at sentencing for a crime he was never charged with? What about a situation where the defendant legally could not even be charged with that crime in the first place? It happens more than you might think. Take for instance the following scenario. A defendant pleads guilty to a fraud crime. The plea agreement contains numerous stipulations but leaves space for the government to argue about the defendant's "relevant conduct" at sentencing. As sentencing approaches, the government informs the parties that it has conducted an investigation and unearthed new evidence that the defendant not only committed fraud, but also intimidated a witness a number of years prior in an attempt to conceal the fraud. The defendant was not charged with witness intimidation, nor could he be given that the statute of limitations ran out long ago. Common sense might dictate that the defendant should not be subject to punishment for that unadjudicated conduct. But in reality, the prosecution may have lucked out. The government faces a much lower burden of proof and virtually no evidentiary hurdles at sentencing.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why So Many Great Lawyers Stink at Business Development and What Law Firms Are Doing About It
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
A Lawyer's System for Active Reading
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
Protecting Innovation in the Cyber World from Patent Trolls
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.