Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

DOJ Issues New Rule Regulating Handling of Bulk Sensitive Personal Data

By Craig Heeren and Mollie Sitkowski and Angela Lam
December 01, 2024

By Craig R. Heeren, Mollie D. Sitkowski and Angela Lam

The Department of Justice (DOJ) has proposed a rule that would regulate certain transactions involving bulk sensitive personal data. Public comments are due in 30 days from the notice date.
The rule would implement a complex regulatory framework, with civil and criminal enforcement, that is similar to sanctions and export licensing regimes. It also implicates federal cybersecurity requirements, government contracting and CFIUS actions.
Businesses that handle significant amounts of sensitive personal data, as well as those that handle any amount of certain U.S. government data, should ensure they are prepared for these significant new potential regulations.
On Oct. 21, 2024, the National Security Division of the Department of Justice (DOJ NSD) issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) that would establish a comprehensive regulatory framework to prevent and restrict the transfer of “bulk sensitive personal data” to countries and entities that are deemed a risk to U.S. national security. As explained in a prior insight regarding an advance notice of proposed rulemaking on this issue, the DOJ is issuing this rule after the Biden administration directed federal agencies to issue regulations to respond to the concern of misuse of sensitive data that could impact national security. The NPRM addresses comments provided through the advance notice process, details the proposed rule, and provides for an additional 30-day comment period. As discussed below, the proposed rule is a significant effort to regulate data through civil and criminal enforcement mechanisms akin to sanctions and export control regulations. Businesses potentially subject to its reach should carefully consider how to handle the rule’s implementation.

This premium content is locked for Cybersecurity Law & Strategy subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

Compliance Officers: Recent Regulatory Guidance and Enforcement Actions and Mitigating the Risk of Personal Liability Image

This article explores legal developments over the past year that may impact compliance officer personal liability.