Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
As a lawyer exclusively representing franchisees, the types of claims that I see are numerous and varied. Anything from a franchisor’s failure to approve a transfer, to a threatened termination, to failure to support the franchise in a way the franchisee is expecting (which happens a lot) — the calls I receive keep my job interesting. However, the call that I and my colleagues get most frequently relates to fraud; someone somewhere oversold the franchise opportunity, typically in multiple ways.
Unlike the sale of a typical business, someone who is selling a franchise is really selling the use of a trademark and particularized systems. Finding the location, building the unit, and operating the business are all left up to the franchisee. Because the franchisee bears nearly the entirety of the financial risk, government regulation, at both the state and federal level, focuses primarily on attempting to prevent fraud in the sale of franchises by requiring robust disclosure of the franchise opportunity.
Unsurprisingly, the primary question franchisees want answered is “after I have paid to get into this business, how much money can I make?” To help answer this question, one of the federally required disclosures, known as Item 19, prevents a franchisor from making financial performance representations outside of the disclosure document (the FDD) or that are in any manner inconsistent with what is contained within the FDD. In other words, you can tell someone that the average franchisee makes a certain amount per year, but you need the data that establishes that to be true; you cannot cherry-pick the data to drive up the number, and if you say it in your marketing materials, those numbers need to appear in your FDD as well.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.