Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Pragmatic Post-Purdue Approach Behind NJ’s Rise As Strong Venue Option for Chapter 11 Cases
One of the key elements of a Chapter 11 plan that bankruptcy courts must tackle is the extent of the plan’s releases, including whether a requirement that parties must affirmatively “opt-out” of a plan’s releases sufficiently manifests consent to the releases for those that do not opt-out. The U.S. Supreme Court’s 2024 decision in Harrington v. Purdue Pharma sparked nationwide debate over how consent to third-party releases is addressed in Chapter 11 bankruptcy plans.
While the Supreme Court clarified that claimants must consent to third-party releases, it left a critical question unanswered: Do release opt-out provisions constitute valid consent?
In the wake of this ambiguity, New Jersey bankruptcy courts have continued their consistent pre-Purdue trend of approving opt-out provisions in Chapter 11 plans, emphasizing a pragmatic and flexible approach. This stands in contrast to certain other jurisdictions, including Delaware, where some bankruptcy judges have intensified their scrutiny of plan release language in recent cases and have favored opt-in mechanisms over opt-out provisions to manifest consent.
This consistency in New Jersey in approving opt-outs — even post-Purdue Pharma — along with other practical considerations, such as bidding procedures and full DIP roll-ups being approved on day one and efficient management of cases, is why New Jersey has become a hotbed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy filings, including well-known companies such as Rite Aid, WeWork, Bed Bath & Beyond, David’s Bridal, Sam Ash and BowFlex, among many others.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
How AI Has Affected PR
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.