Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Pragmatic Post-Purdue Approach Behind NJ’s Rise As Strong Venue Option for Chapter 11 Cases
One of the key elements of a Chapter 11 plan that bankruptcy courts must tackle is the extent of the plan’s releases, including whether a requirement that parties must affirmatively “opt-out” of a plan’s releases sufficiently manifests consent to the releases for those that do not opt-out. The U.S. Supreme Court’s 2024 decision in Harrington v. Purdue Pharma sparked nationwide debate over how consent to third-party releases is addressed in Chapter 11 bankruptcy plans.
While the Supreme Court clarified that claimants must consent to third-party releases, it left a critical question unanswered: Do release opt-out provisions constitute valid consent?
In the wake of this ambiguity, New Jersey bankruptcy courts have continued their consistent pre-Purdue trend of approving opt-out provisions in Chapter 11 plans, emphasizing a pragmatic and flexible approach. This stands in contrast to certain other jurisdictions, including Delaware, where some bankruptcy judges have intensified their scrutiny of plan release language in recent cases and have favored opt-in mechanisms over opt-out provisions to manifest consent.
This consistency in New Jersey in approving opt-outs — even post-Purdue Pharma — along with other practical considerations, such as bidding procedures and full DIP roll-ups being approved on day one and efficient management of cases, is why New Jersey has become a hotbed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy filings, including well-known companies such as Rite Aid, WeWork, Bed Bath & Beyond, David’s Bridal, Sam Ash and BowFlex, among many others.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why So Many Great Lawyers Stink at Business Development and What Law Firms Are Doing About It
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
A Lawyer's System for Active Reading
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
Protecting Innovation in the Cyber World from Patent Trolls
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.