Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
A partner’s tax basis in his partnership interest (outside basis) generally represents his economic investment in a partnership plus his share of the partnership’s liabilities. In many cases, a partner’s outside basis will correspond to his share of the partnership’s tax basis in its assets (inside basis). However, there are situations when the two can differ, and various transactions can result in adjustments to the tax basis of a partnership’s property.
If a partnership makes a distribution of property to a partner, the partner generally receives a tax basis in the distributed property equal to the partnership’s inside basis in the property. However, if the partnership’s inside basis in the property was higher than the partner’s outside basis in his partnership interest, the partner’s basis in the distributed property is limited to his outside basis.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.