Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
ChatGPT’s Ghibli-Style Images Are Testing Copyright Law
Last month, a flood of whimsical, dreamlike portraits in the style of Studio Ghibli (the Japanese animation studio) swept across social media. OpenAI’s ChatGPT-4o had rolled out a new image-generation feature — allowing users to simply describe a scene, like “my family as characters in a Ghibli movie,” and receive AI-generated art in seconds. One such post, a family portrait rendered in the beloved aesthetic of “Spirited Away” and “My Neighbor Totoro,” two iconic films by Studio Ghibli known for their lush, hand-drawn visual style, went viral with over 27 million views. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman later quipped that the servers were “melting” from demand. In fact, the once-instant Chat-GPT is providing estimates of 24-48 hours to generate Ghibli-style images.
These “Ghibli-style” images — which captured the studio’s distinct, nostalgic fantasy look — spread rapidly as users turned family photos, travel scenes, and pets into what looked like frames from a high-end animated film. What began as a playful social trend quickly raised legal concerns. Within days, users began reporting that OpenAI had restricted prompts referencing specific artistic styles, including Studio Ghibli. While the company did not formally announce the change, this shift appeared to reflect a cautious response to potential intellectual property issues. This trend offers a live case study of how generative AI may implicate core doctrines of copyright law, including derivative works, substantial similarity, and fair use.
Where Does Copyright Law Draw the Line on Style — and on AI Training Data?
Under U.S. copyright law, an artist’s “style” is generally not protectable. The law protects expression, not ideas — and style is often considered an idea or technique. That said, if AI-generated content closely mimics copyrighted characters, scenes, or other expressive elements, it may still qualify as an unauthorized derivative work. In this case, AI models can generate images so stylistically aligned with Ghibli that they evoke specific films or characters. Even if these images are not exact copies, courts may consider whether they are “substantially similar” to the original works. The threshold for infringement is no longer about copying pixels — it’s about capturing protected expression in a new medium.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
The Stranger to the Deed Rule
In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.