Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Why Hire a Fractional CMO for Your Law Firm?
Many law firms, especially small and midsize practices, struggle with their marketing and business development efforts. Often, they turn to traditional solutions, such as hiring a marketing coordinator, hoping this role can create meaningful impact. However, a coordinator-level professional may lack the strategic expertise and legal industry-specific insights needed to craft and implement effective marketing strategies. Without a robust game plan, the outcome often becomes reactive, administrative marketing work, sidelining efforts to establish the firm’s unique positioning and visibility.
A fractional CMO (chief marketing officer) offers an alternative. As an outsourced marketing executive, a fractional CMO serves as a part-time or on-demand solution to deliver the strategic direction, planning and oversight of a traditional full-time CMO without the long-term salary commitment. For law firms facing complex client acquisition challenges, a fractional CMO can develop focused strategies while fostering operational efficiency — ensuring your firm’s resources are optimally used to meet growth objectives.
Strategic Advantages of Hiring a Fractional CMO for Law Firms
- Legal Marketing Expertise: Fractional CMOs often bring specialized knowledge of professional service industries, including law. They can craft strategies specifically tailored to attract your target audience of corporate clients, individuals seeking counsel or niche industries your firm serves (e.g., health care or technology). They can also help ensure regulatory compliance with advertising standards for legal services, a crucial consideration for law firms.
- Cost-Efficient Leadership: Fractional CMOs give firms access to senior marketing talent without requiring a full-salary commitment. This is especially valuable for small to midsize firms that can’t justify the budget for a full-time CMO but still require high-level strategic leadership to succeed in a competitive legal marketplace.
- Holistic Marketing Oversight: From planning a legal blog editorial calendar to implementing lead-generation tactics (e.g., webinars, SEO-focused content or LinkedIn campaigns), fractional CMOs ensure diverse initiatives align with the firm’s overall business objectives. They provide leadership and guidance to your existing marketing team or resources, directing work in a way that drives measurable outcomes.
- Objective Insights and Assessments: Fractional CMOs come into firms with fresh perspectives on the marketing status quo. They can identify gaps in current strategies, pinpoint missed opportunities and propose impactful ways to separate legal services from competitors in an increasingly saturated market.
Key Considerations When Hiring a Fractional CMO for Your Law Firm
First, evaluate experience level. Look for candidates with a strong background in marketing for professional services, particularly within the legal industry or related fields like consulting or accounting. A proven track record of developing and executing successful strategies for firms facing similar challenges is a crucial indicator of the ability to deliver results.
Understanding the nuances of legal marketing is another important consideration. A fractional CMO with experience in the legal field will already be familiar with industry-specific complexities, such as professional directories, thought leadership strategies like publishing or speaking engagements and other high-value opportunities to attract clients in a competitive market.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
The Stranger to the Deed Rule
In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.