Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The commercial property insurance industry is undergoing a dramatic shift. Gone are the days when property owners and operators could simply provide a building appraisal or portfolio valuation to an insurance broker, who would then reach out to a handful of insurance companies to obtain quotes. In the past, the process was relatively straightforward — there was a clear, well-defined formula for insuring property assets.
Today, however, insurance companies have adopted a much more holistic approach to underwriting. No longer are properties assessed purely based on tangible factors like age, valuation or size. Insurers are expanding their scope to consider the “intangibles” such as the risk management practices of the property owner or operator, the quality of the property management team, and even the way in which the owner or operator runs the business. In fact, in some cases, owners and operators may find themselves having to meet with insurance companies face-to-face, engaging in relationship-building conversations (and perhaps even a bit of wining and dining) to ensure their assets are properly insured.
This shift represents a move toward a model where relationships once again take center stage. In a sense, it’s a return to the “old way” of doing business — where trust and personal interaction are as important as the numbers on a spreadsheet. For many property owners and operators, this may feel like a surprising throwback. After all, the idea of personal relationships in insurance seemed to have faded in an era dominated by digital platforms and impersonal transactions.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
As consumers continue to shift purchasing and consumption habits in the aftermath of the pandemic, manufacturers are increasingly reliant on third-party logistics and warehousing to ensure their products timely reach the market.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?